Close Abbey Road?

I was in Abbey Road Studio One earlier this week for a music industry gathering of performers and was struck yet again by the personality of the room. It’s such a big room and so many things have happened in it. Not least of all is the televising of All You Need Is Love. For whatever reason I just couldn’t get the images of it out of my head when I was supposed to be listening to some of the presentations and speeches from the event I was attending. Take a Beatle fan into Abbey Road Studio One and it’s pretty much impossible for that fan to be thinking about anything else other than the thought that you are inside one of the most guarded Beatle sites in the world. Not only the Beatles, I might add. It’s amazing how many of the best known film themes and classical works have been recorded there – in short, it’s just an incredible place and without doubt, one of the premier rooms for recording in the world.
So, imagine my shock, when from the podium came the words….and I'm paraphrasing here... “…we implore EMI to keep this studio open” and that it’s one of the few places left in this country that can “accommodate a full orchestra for recording”. I came to life somewhat. What is this chap saying? Are they going to sell this place, is it going to change hands or worse are they going to close it? Reading between the lines on what was being said at a political level here I have to guess that in this current financial climate, both studio and punters are suffering. Abbey Road is an expensive place to work in and of course the technological improvements made to recording facilities in the wider world mean that largely, similar results can be produced in a bedroom. That’s just a fact. Why would a band want to go into Abbey Road and spend many thousands of bucks when those bucks might be best served investing in a comprehensive recording set up which will give them access to their recordings everyday and all of the time? One reason a band would go there would be to get access to some of the fantastic recording facilities available, and a microphone collection which, quite frankly, would knock yer socks off. Another is more fundamental to the studio itself – it’s the one thing that you can ONLY get in that location – it’s the rooms themselves. As soon as the ambient mics placed in the room are pushed up on the desk, it’s like Abbey Road arrives. I for example simply cannot hear a Beatles track without hearing Studio Two- if it was recorded in there. There is a sound attached to the room and it is impossible to take out. That is the one thing that can’t really be replicated electronically in the form of a plugin and even if they could it still wouldn’t BE the room. The fact is that people don’t just go into studios because of who recorded there in the past, although that does give a clue as to the possible continuing life of Abbey Road Studios, should it close, change hands or function. In fact it’s almost unthinkable that one of the most famous recording studios in the world could! The interesting thing is that when you come out of the studio there are ALWAYS people outside, writing on the wall, nudging each other and taking photographs. I hope it never happens but it would have an afterlife as one of the premier tourist venues in the world and that really would be down to the Beatles. I can’t quite get my head about that idea though. Those rooms are living, breathing spaces of creativity where music is and has been crafted and moulded from nothing into recordings that we hear probably more regularly than we realise. This studio should never become a museum and should always do what it does best – record great music.

It's going to the dogs...

Whilst sitting watching the television last night I realised that we have now moved a generation up and away from the 2nd Generation Beatle Aware. We have now stepped over the line to a point where Beatle music is being used to advertise. It can only be a matter of time until it is being used to sell toilet roll. I hasten to add though that it wasn’t the original recordings, so that’s at least something. It was a fairly ethereal version of From Me To You which was being used to hook the viewers into the John Lewis stores over the Chrimble period. According to this link the track is sung by members of the John Lewis Music Society! It’s actually not a bad version and if it captures the public imagination it may well end up charting because of course it’s a brilliant song. Annoyingly and against my grain, it’s easy to see why the advertisers are desperate to use the boys’ tunes. If you look at the video it fits perfectly and indeed the tune takes on a different and more tender feel. However, all of that aside, in my view these songs should be protected from such interference. It is not like the writers need the money! The only reason they are being used is just raw commercialism. This new route of Beatle-lising the world with rock star games and now TV ads is going to undo all of the good work done thus far to keep it away from such nonsense. This is the slippery slope and it’s all downhill from here in my view. It is a matter of time now before we hear an actual Beatle recording up there. Nothing will be off limits soon. The Beatles are a commercial product in and of themselves so I have no argument with them doing whatever they need to do in order that they sell yet more product, spreading the word to a new generation and so on. However, the questions have to be asked; just what on EARTH are they doing? Why are they not concentrating on putting out the remastered music, the films etc; Who is making these choices and ok-ing these decisions? Something is afoot in Pepperland folks and we might need to employ Old Fred once more to save the music!
My personal opinion is that this is a bad and unrequired move on the part of the Beatles management and can only be motivated by wonga, which as I’ve said earlier I don’t really get. It’s not like they need to tell the public who they are really is it?
The top hats at Apple should be dealing with the core issues and stop concentrating on the Corp issues.

Just get back to the band please folks!

PS

And in reference to Ringo’s latest outburst, (which I can understand to a degree) it would seem to make sense that if you don’t want attention then don’t turn up at an awards ceremony!!

Remaster, Rock Star, Remaster....

I’m with Allan Kozinn of the New York Times… the bottom line is that The Beatles should be concentrating on the release of their primary product – that is of course the music catalogue, not some daft Rock Star type game. Then closely followed by the Let It Be’s and Shea Stadiums they are still sitting on for whatever reason. It is actually incredible that there is basically no digitally remastered material available from the world’s premier group; is it not? I don’t care too much for the itunes or mp3 formats. What I want is full on, red blooded CD’s. The Beatles used to lead the world in innovation in many ways. Even the Anthology broke new ground…indeed up until then there was nothing like it from just about any other group. In other words, they continued the good work they’d always done. Ground breaking work on the video end of things whilst on the audio end they made the impossible happen with Free As a Bird and Real Love. As a fan I was proud to know that the boys weren’t just any band who wanted to cash in on their past achievements. They took the hard road, carved a new route, raised the bar and set a new standard for the world simply to gawp at. As it stands, twelve years later, it seems that they have hit some kind of impasse. I don’t get it. Just what might be the problem? In a general sense no one could blame them for not getting into bed with the digital download world at the beginning. It could have been a flash in the pan Beatamax (!) moment, so fair enough. However it has to be said that even the most cautious amongst us have to say that this format is here to stay and in fact IS where we are now. I feel that it is embarrassing for them at this stage. This band should still be leading the pack, breaking new ground and turning it to their advantage. It is not as though they have to create new material to convert. They have a complete catalogue ready to go, so again - what’s the problem? It’s obvious that there is a rights argument and financial reasona behind it all, it is the only argument that makes sense.

Also, whilst we’re on this digital thing, I read somewhere that the remixed catalogue will still retain the original mixes. In other words, those same unbelievably BAD stereo images which are murder to listen to on headphones. In fact, I gave up listening to the boys on headphones until the good folks at Purple Chick came up with their brilliant packages because it was such uncomfortable listening experience. Before that, I had to go to the extraordinary lengths of employing a mixing desk with a PAN control so I could route stuff through it to bring the bass more to centre. It was a terrible decision to release the CD’s with those appalling stereo mixes in 1987! If the idea was somehow to preserve the original work then all of the discs should have been in mono with the exception of the albums that were originally put out in stereo. There is just no value in putting out those stereo mixes again. They were a compromise when they were made in the Sixties, a travesty in the Eighties and by now it is plain stupid to put them out in that condition. The Beatles have an opportunity to put out pristine versions of the best work ever put to tape in a way that just blows the opposition away all over again to genuinely improve and polish this incredible work. As it stands, albeit through speculation, it seems that once again, an opportunity may be lost. When this catalogue goes out again under the “remastered” banner, it might just be the most important thing that has happened to the CD since it’s birth and given that they are in a position to do so, wouldn’t it be great if boys once again pushed the envelope just that little bit further?

PS

Best of luck with the VOTE America!